Key Takeaways

In this guide

Why property developers are now reporting entities What counts as a designated service Developer-specific AML risks The 6 core obligations Off-the-plan: when to conduct CDD SPVs and reporting groups Risk profiles by developer type Penalties How AMLTranche helps developers Getting started checklist Frequently asked questions

Why Property Developers Are Now Reporting Entities

Australia’s AML/CTF regime has historically covered banks, remittance providers, and gambling operators. Property — one of the most significant ML/TF risk vectors globally — was excluded. The Tranche 2 reforms close that gap.

The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) has repeatedly identified Australian real estate as vulnerable to money laundering. Foreign and domestic criminals use property purchases to integrate illicit funds into the legitimate economy. Developers who sell directly to buyers are a primary channel for this activity because they handle large transactions, often involve foreign purchasers, and historically have had no identity verification obligations.

From 1 July 2026, property developers join real estate agents, conveyancers, and legal professionals as reporting entities under the AML/CTF Act. This means full compliance with customer due diligence, sanctions screening, suspicious matter reporting, and record-keeping requirements.

What Counts as a “Designated Service” for Developers

A designated service is any activity that triggers AML/CTF obligations. For property developers, the following activities are designated services:

What is NOT a designated service for developers

Developing property that you retain and lease (build-to-rent) is not a sale and is not a designated service. Similarly, engaging a real estate agent to sell on your behalf may shift the reporting obligation to the agent for that transaction — but only if the agent is the sole point of contact with the buyer and the developer has no direct engagement in the sale.

Developer-Specific AML Risks

Property development carries elevated ML/TF risks that are distinct from those faced by real estate agents or conveyancers. Your risk assessment must account for these factors:

Key risk indicators for developers

1 Foreign buyers and shell companies. Off-the-plan purchases by overseas buyers using corporate structures, trusts, or nominees to obscure the beneficial owner. Layered ownership through multiple jurisdictions is a significant red flag.
2 Large cash deposits and structured payments. Deposits paid in cash, or purchase prices structured through multiple bank accounts to avoid reporting thresholds. Any request to split payments across unrelated accounts warrants scrutiny.
3 Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs). Foreign government officials, their families, or close associates purchasing Australian property. PEPs require Enhanced Customer Due Diligence (ECDD) regardless of the transaction amount.
4 Rapid contract assignments. Off-the-plan contracts that are assigned or nominated to third parties before settlement — particularly multiple assignments or assignments to unrelated parties — can indicate layering or value manipulation.
5 Buyers from high-risk jurisdictions. Purchasers from countries identified by FATF as having strategic AML deficiencies, or from jurisdictions subject to Australian sanctions (DFAT consolidated list).
6 Trust and SMSF purchases. Properties purchased through discretionary trusts, family trusts, or self-managed superannuation funds where the beneficial ownership chain is complex or opaque.

The 6 Core Obligations

Every property developer who provides a designated service must meet these six requirements under the AML/CTF Act:

Developer compliance obligations

1 Enrol with AUSTRAC Online. Each legal entity that provides a designated service must enrol separately. For developers with multiple SPVs, each selling SPV requires its own enrolment (though they can share an AML/CTF program via a reporting group).
2 Develop an AML/CTF program. A written program with Part A (risk identification, mitigation, and management) and Part B (customer identification procedures). The program must be tailored to your development business, not a generic template.
3 Conduct Customer Due Diligence (CDD). Verify buyer identity before entering into a contract of sale. For corporate buyers, identify the beneficial owners controlling 25% or more of the entity. For trust buyers, identify the trustee, settlor, and beneficiaries.
4 Screen against DFAT sanctions and PEP databases. Every buyer must be screened at onboarding and periodically throughout the relationship. Sanctions matches must be escalated and resolved before proceeding with the transaction.
5 Report suspicious matters to AUSTRAC. If you form a suspicion that a transaction may involve proceeds of crime or terrorism financing, lodge a Suspicious Matter Report within 3 business days (24 hours for terrorism-related suspicions). Tipping off the buyer about the report is a criminal offence.
6 Retain records for 7 years. All CDD records, transaction documentation, screening results, and compliance records must be kept for a minimum of 7 years after the transaction or relationship ends.

Off-the-Plan Sales: When to Conduct CDD

Off-the-plan sales present a unique timing challenge. The gap between contract signing and settlement can be 18 to 36 months. When exactly must CDD be completed?

The answer is clear: before or at the point of entering into the contract of sale. The designated service is the sale of real estate, and that service begins when the contract is formed — not at settlement.

This means your sales team must integrate CDD into the pre-contract process. Before a buyer signs an off-the-plan contract, you should have:

Ongoing monitoring for long-settlement transactions

For off-the-plan sales with extended settlement periods, you should also conduct periodic re-screening of buyers against updated sanctions lists. DFAT updates its consolidated sanctions list regularly. A buyer who was clear at contract signing may appear on a sanctions list 12 months later. AMLTranche automates this with scheduled DFAT refresh screening.

SPVs and Reporting Groups

Most property developers operate through Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs) — separate legal entities created for each development project. Each SPV that sells property directly is a separate reporting entity with its own AML/CTF obligations.

Without a reporting group, a developer running five active projects through five SPVs would need five separate AML/CTF programs, five compliance officer appointments, and five independent reviews.

Reporting groups solve this. If one entity controls the SPVs (a typical parent-subsidiary structure), they automatically form a Business Group under the AML/CTF Act. The parent company becomes the lead entity and maintains a single shared AML/CTF program for all group members.

Developer Reporting Group Structure
Lead EntityABC Developments Pty Ltd
SPV 1Harbour View Project
SPV 2Parkside Residences
SPV 3Metro Quarter
Shared AML/CTF Program One Compliance Officer Single Risk Assessment

Each SPV still enrols with AUSTRAC individually, but they share the program, training, and compliance infrastructure. For a detailed guide on setting this up, see our article on reporting groups for property developers with SPVs.

Risk Profiles by Developer Type

While the obligations are identical, the risk profile varies significantly depending on the type of development and the buyer demographic:

Developer Type Key Risk Factors Typical Risk Level
ASX-listed developer High transaction volume, foreign investor programs, multiple jurisdictions, complex corporate structures High
Mid-tier apartment developer Off-the-plan sales to overseas buyers, bulk sales to investment groups, contract assignments High
Land subdivision developer House-and-land packages, domestic buyer focus, lower foreign exposure but high volume Medium
Boutique residential developer Smaller scale, often local buyers, but may attract high-net-worth individuals or trust purchases Medium
Commercial/industrial developer Large transaction values, corporate buyers, SMSF purchases, overseas investors High
Build-to-sell volume builder High volume, standardised product, diverse buyer pool, display village walk-ins Medium–High

Penalties for Non-Compliance

AUSTRAC enforces the AML/CTF Act aggressively. The penalty framework for non-compliance includes:

Enforcement consequences

! Civil penalties up to $23.1 million for companies per contravention. Individual directors face up to $4.6 million. Multiple breaches across multiple transactions can be aggregated into a single enforcement action.
! Criminal offences for failure to report suspicious matters, tipping off a customer about an SMR, and providing false or misleading information to AUSTRAC.
! Enforceable undertakings requiring the developer to implement specific compliance improvements under AUSTRAC supervision, at the developer’s cost.
! Reputational damage. AUSTRAC publishes enforcement actions. For ASX-listed developers, an AUSTRAC action triggers continuous disclosure obligations and can affect share price, funding arrangements, and joint venture partnerships.

How AMLTranche Helps Developers

AMLTranche is purpose-built for Australian property professionals — not a generic KYC platform repurposed for real estate. For developers specifically, the platform provides:

Getting Started Checklist

Developer compliance checklist

1 Map your designated services. Use the AUSTRAC eligibility checker and identify every legal entity in your group that sells property directly. Each is a separate reporting entity.
2 Establish your reporting group. If you have multiple SPVs controlled by a parent entity, designate the parent as lead entity for a Business Group.
3 Enrol each entity with AUSTRAC. Portal opens 31 March 2026. Each SPV enrols individually, referencing the reporting group.
4 Appoint a compliance officer. Must have sufficient seniority and authority to implement the program across all group entities.
5 Conduct your ML/TF risk assessment. Evaluate customer types, transaction channels, geographic exposure, and product risk across all active projects.
6 Build your AML/CTF program. Parts A and B, tailored to your development business. AMLTranche auto-generates this from your risk assessment.
7 Train your sales and project teams. Review the AUSTRAC "before you start" guidance. Everyone involved in buyer-facing transactions needs to understand CDD procedures, red flag indicators, and escalation protocols.
8 Integrate CDD into your sales process. Build identity verification and sanctions screening into your pre-contract workflow so it becomes a standard step, not an afterthought.

Purpose-built for property developers.

From a single boutique project to an ASX-listed portfolio with 20 SPVs — AMLTranche scales with your development business. Set up in under an hour.

Get Started → Book a Demo →

Get a free compliance checklist for your business:

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Are property developers reporting entities under Tranche 2?

Yes. Any entity that sells real estate by way of business is a reporting entity from 1 July 2026. This includes developers selling off-the-plan, subdivided land, completed homes, and commercial property directly to buyers.

When should CDD be done for off-the-plan sales?

Before or at the point of entering into the contract of sale. The designated service begins at contract formation, not settlement. For long-settlement transactions, periodic re-screening is also required.

Do I need a separate AML program for each SPV?

Not if your SPVs form a reporting group. A Business Group (where one entity controls the others) allows all members to share a single AML/CTF program under a lead entity. Each SPV must still enrol with AUSTRAC individually.

What AML risks are specific to developers?

Foreign buyers using shell companies, large cash deposits, politically exposed persons, rapid contract assignments before settlement, and complex trust or SMSF ownership structures are all elevated risk factors for property developers.

How much does compliance cost?

Boutique developers can achieve full compliance from $59–149/month with AMLTranche. Mid-tier and ASX-listed developers with multiple projects typically invest $299+/month. Non-compliance penalties of up to $23.1 million make the investment proportional.

Can I rely on my sales agent’s AML compliance?

No. If you are the vendor, you are the reporting entity. Even with a sales agent engaged, the developer retains obligations for any designated service they provide. The agent has their own separate AML obligations.